I’ve
never been one of those stop-and-smell-the-roses kinds of people. Obsessed with efficiency, my favorite past
time was always checking something off my to-do list so I could move along to
the next item. The “life is a journey,
not a destination” philosophy escaped me until my early 40’s, although
achieving that goal was also on my to-do list.
Yet
I have always embraced is the idea of minimalism believing you can get more
done by streamlining. Whether it’s in
verbal or written communications, architectural or interior design, I’ve
strived for efficiency --
the ratio of the effective or useful output to the total input in
any system. I get frustrated seeing
people spin their wheels instead of mapping out the critical path and taking
it. I believe we should focus on one or
two goals at a time and work towards them right now. Because life is short.
For an architect, I’m strangely obsessed with tiny houses on
wheels. I love that every nook and
cranny of them is useable by necessity.
I love the idea of living minimally. As I searched for happiness, I ultimately
realized the following are good guidelines for a less stressful life.
Buy
less. When I first started making decent money in my 20’s, retail
therapy was my favorite past time. After
all, Frank Lloyd Wright lived above his means, so why shouldn’t I? I wanted to reward myself for my 12-hour work
days. It took about 10 years to realize that buying and having stuff didn’t
make me happy. Eventually, I had to buy
more expensive items to get a quick fix.
Then even a $100,000 car didn’t get me high for more than a few days. Buying
things didn’t buy me happiness, and actually caused unhappiness due to the
added work and stress that supported my buying habits.
Do
less. Upon learning the
“buy-less” lesson, my focus transferred to experiences
instead of things, surely a more worthy undertaking. Again, I used experiences as a reward for the
hard work: vacations, golf, restaurants,
concerts… all expensive past-times that required more money, more work. I was working hard and playing hard, but was
I fulfilled? A lot was getting crammed
into this experience called life, but was this really living? I was too busy, too obligated to plans, and yearned
for more time to simply relax and ponder.
Eat
less and work out less. I’ve read a ton about health and
fitness. Along with design and
psychology, it’s one of my top interests.
There is a group of people who believe that the process of digestion
wears out our bodies significantly more than any other bodily function. They eat as little as possible and avoid meat
in an effort to be kind to their digestive organs and live as long as possible. I’m not going to lie, they look a bit emaciated, but the concept is
interesting.
I’ve gone through phases where I’ve worked out a lot - about
7 to 10 hours of cardio or weight training per week in a never-ending and misguided attempt
to lose a few pounds. This is an
exercise in inefficiency. All the latest
information on weight loss indicates that diet, not exercise, is about 80% responsible
for weight loss. Working out makes me
hungry, so I eat more. And, as with
work, I also feel the need to reward myself when I work out. With what?
With fattening foods (carbs and sugar) that create the need to work out
more.
Here’s the secret to weight loss, at least for me: Only work out enough to have a strong heart,
bones, and muscles. Don’t work out to
lose weight. Doing 20 minutes of intense
cardio plus 20-minutes of intense weight-lifting 2 to 3 times per week is
sufficient for good health. That equals
1-1/2 to 2 hours per week, hardly any time at all, and you’ll have tons of
extra time for other things, especially since eating less will also free up
your schedule. It’s helpful to go on a work-out fast for a week to kick
this off. Most people try to simultaneously
eat less and work out more. Instead, try
eating less and not working out at all for a week. You won’t be as hungry, and your stomach will
shrink in that first week. Then return
to the minimal work-out plan outlined above.
Drinking lots of water is the most significant thing someone
can do for good health, yet the constant trips to the restroom have this
efficiency-buff unable to fully embrace this agenda. Having said that, I cannot support a “Drink
Less” position, unless we’re speaking of drinking and driving, and if so,
consider this…
Drive
less. Many people who
drive to a big city for work complain about losing two hours of each day. Here’s a tip.
Don’t do it. It’s your choice to
live in a suburb and work in the city.
Why not live where you work? There’s
a big migration of suburbanites back into the cities for this very reason. Plus driving less
is good for the environment as is the dense and efficient nature of city
living. Transportation accounts for about 30% of greenhouse gas
emissions. Commutes are a big part of that equation.
Los Angelans have a secret.
Outsiders envision that those that live in LA are constantly trapped in
traffic. But LA is actually like a handful
of small towns, and many people live in the immediate area where they work, and
don’t drive in LA traffic for more than a couple miles.
I’m lucky to live in Santa Barbara, California, a geographically
compact town of about 100,000 people. The
population is large enough that it offers everything one could want such as
theaters and museums, yet small enough that everything is within a 10-minute
drive, or a 30-minute walk. Granted,
Santa Barbara is expensive, but there are many similar cities that are
not. College towns tend to offer this
lifestyle.
Many people move to the suburbs because they can get more
home for their money. Homes are more
expensive in big cities, because that’s where the lucrative jobs are. But the money saved on gasoline and car maintenance,
not to mention, all the other stuff we do to reward ourselves for the stressful
drive will help offset the higher prices of city housing. Doing away with your car altogether offers
even more savings potential. Most of us
use our car only a couple hours per day, and we’d need it even less if we lived
in a compact city. Many big cities provide
excellent public transportation and are serviced by car share companies which are
convenient and low-cost. Also, walking
and cycling are common modes of transportation in big cities which provides
exercise as well.
Or consider these options:
Live in less. A larger home is yet another rolling snowball
which creates the need to work more to pay for more furniture, art, utilities,
housecleaning, repairs, etc.
Own less. I used to think that if someone rented, they
were somehow less successful. It’s
actually a lifestyle choice. Owning a
home is not all it’s cracked up to be. Not
only is there the commitment of a large mortgage payment, there is the cost of property
taxes, insurance, Home Owner’s Association dues, and repairs, not to mention
the time associated with dealing with repairs.
I’ve owned five homes and am still saddled with one. Why?
Because my accountant told me to.
I made enough money that I needed the tax break. What a great segway!
Work
less. I love what I do, yet
still don’t want to do any one thing for 60 hours a week. Moreover, most of us work to make money to
buy the things we mistakenly think we need.
Even the “basic necessities” like food, exercise, a car, and housing,
are not necessarily must-haves, let alone $200 shoes or the bi-monthly
mani/pedi’s.
I
t’s important to do a cost/benefit analysis of a job. Is it really worth the $100k salary, or about
$60k after taxes, if you need to spend that entire $60k (or more) on:
· driving
two hours a day
· owning
a big house and fancy car, and all that it takes to maintain them
· eating
out
· working
out at the health club
· rewarding
ourselves with all those things we need to de-stress?
Even if you consider it in purely financial terms, and don’t
consider the value of time, how much money you make is not what’s important.
How much money you have left is. Like
the exercise-eat-exercise hamster wheel, the harder we work, the more we spend. I’ve found that working 30 hours per week is
ideal, and I actually have more money (and time) left over than when I worked
50-60 hours per week.
Many people have no choice to work at least 40 to 50 hours
per week due to the expectations of their employers. I suggest you challenge that assumption. But if you feel it’s necessary to work that
much, make the most of the few remaining hours in the day. Imagine how much
extra time you’d have if you lived 10 minutes from work, or didn’t go to the
gym each day, or get your car gassed-up or washed.
Do these “less-ims” create a less-than life? Quite the opposite. They create MORE - more time to do the things
that are meaningful such as spending quality time with friends and family,
laughing, conversing, enjoying the outdoors, reading, sleeping, and the
occasional splurge. Ironically, these
things are virtually free. All of these
“less-isms” have exponential effects on the quality of our life and our
environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment